The Green Agenda is at it again!

 

Dear Readers,

 

The Green Agenda is at it again!  The New York State Attorney General has struck a deal with Xcel Energy, a Colorado based power company, forcing it to disclose to investors the potential costs of dealing with global warming.

 

That's right;  the New York State Attorney General apparently believes he can issue edicts from his perch atop Wall Street, dictating global warming policies for the entire country.  This is an outrageous abuse of power, and Congress needs to rein him in.

 

Below, I've included the story from the Rocky Mountain News.  You can also read it online here.

Xcel, New York AG strike climate pact

Xcel Energy and New York's attorney general struck a groundbreaking deal requiring Colorado's biggest electricity and natural gas supplier to tell Wall Street about potential costs tied to dealing with climate change.

The agreement paves the way for other power companies to follow suit.

In its annual report filed with federal securities regulators, Xcel will have to tell investors about the financial risks related to:

* Present and probable future climate change regulation and legislation;

* Lawsuits related to climate change;

* Projected increases in carbon emissions from planned coal-fired power plants;

* And strategies for curbing emissions of greenhouse gases.

"This landmark agreement sets a new industrywide precedent that will force companies to disclose the true financial risks that climate change poses to their investors," N.Y. Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said in a news release.

Xcel CEO Dick Kelly said in a release the accord "will enhance our already aggressive efforts to be responsible environmental stewards."

He added: "We previously provided detailed information concerning the expected impact of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions regulations on our operations, and under this agreement we will make even more detailed disclosures."

 

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 8/30/2008 12:07 AM fatwhiteboy_1 wrote:
    I am not sure about the details of this apparent controversy, but it sounds like a good policy to inform and educate potential investors to the facts concerning their exposure with such investments before it is revealed that they have been misinformed and the premise of same was not what was originally anticipated. This would be a plan for inevitable failure, not unlike the recent Indy-Mac Bank fiasco.

    To say this policy would be abuse of legislative power would compare to the recent actions of N.Y. Senior Senator Charles Schumer, who spilled the beans on the aforementioned troubled bank by leaking privately held, insider information, causing a run on the same, and imminent failure to be subsidized by the American Taxpayers. How could this not be abusing his position?

    My best analogy and application of time-honored wisdom relative to the freedom of such pertinent, advanced, investor information would be..."An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."

    (fatwhiteboy_1)
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.